Home Bamboo Baby Deventeriana

Phal. Misty Green

Phal. Misty Green undoubtedly merits an important place in the Phalaenopsis hall of fame. The hybrid was registered in 1981 by George Schwartz for Joseph Redlinger as a hybrid between Phal. Barbara Moler and Phal. Bamboo Baby. Presumably, Mr. Schwartz wanted to register the hybrid for one reason – or at least 10 reasons: the 10 awards that he had received for various clones of Misty Green at the time that he registered the hybrid.

Writing about Phalaenopsis Misty Green at this point is a little like Macaulay Culkin writing an autobiography. Sure, he’s made some movies but there’s so much ahead of him. The first Phal. Misty Green hybrid was registered in 1983. Eighteen years later, it’s just too early to say anything. I have plants of Phal. Misty Green ‘Nilsa’, AM/AOS as well as ‘Moncho’, AM/AOS (the latter being one of the most vigorous plants I have ever grown) and I can’t wait for the crosses I've made to bloom. Considering Phal. Misty Green’s record to date, some of these hybrids should be magnificent. (N.B. For those new to phals, you have to realize that yellow phal. breeding only began in earnest  about 30 years ago.)

From 1980 until 1994, Phal. Misty Green continued to rack up AOS awards – 27 of them in all. In much the same as its award history, Phal. Misty Green is the parent of several hybrids registered every year, not many but enough to come to a total of about 90 to date. This is interesting. Because both parents were awarded and accessible, Phal. Misty Green was made and remade. In addition, at least one selfing of an awarded clone was made. Stem propagations were made and remade. The price for many was reasonable. Seedlings were readily available. And, exceptionally important, they were very fertile. Because so many seedlings were available, almost anybody doing some hybridizing in the '80s had a plant of Phal. Misty Green.

In the first generation, Phal. Misty Green may not be unique but it is surely one of the top phal. producers of all time. A list of its first-generation hybrids reveals almost 20 hybrids with awards (Dtps. Memoria Rene Chauvin, Phal. August Gold, Phal. Brother Dawn, Phal. Brother Princess, Phal. Buena Cerise Sparks, Phal. Chula, Phal. Corona de Oro, Phal. Everglades Sunset, Phal. Gemstone’s Hawaiian Mist, Phal. Goldberry, Phal. Golden Circles, Phal. Golden Peoker, Phal. Grapefruit, Phal. Misty Moon, Phal. Pine Hill, Phal. Selsal’s Arrakis, Phal. Yellow Lightning), or about 20%. This may not seem like much but it is probably one of the highest percentages in the history of phal. breeding. Is it really better than its parents or has it just been bred better?

As far as great stud plants, you have to remember what happened with Beta and VHS. Although I have never seen a Beta machine, I am told by many people who should know that Beta was much better that VHS but today Beta is a thing of the past and everybody has VHS. Advertising and hype do a lot to shape and form our opinions. Every breeder ran out and purchased Phal. Deventeriana (and then bred with it). Even people new to breeding know that Phal. Deventeriana is a "must have". But how many people have a good Phal. Misty Green and how many people who are new to breeding run out and get one. Many of the "old-timers" are remaking old crosses using superior parents, both species and hybrids, such as Phal. Misty Green, and the results are outstanding.

One of the more interesting (and widely available) hybrids of Phal. Misty Green is Phal. Flight of Birds. Anyone who takes the time will quickly realize that Phal. Misty Green is both a parent and grandparent of Phal. Flight of Birds. (It is a hybrid of Phal. Pine Hill and Phal Misty Green. Phal. Pine Hill is Phal. Lorraine Kenney x Phal. Misty Green.) Yet, only one of the awarded clones seems to have any yellow at all. (Breeding a plant back to its parent is inbreeding or linebreeding. You intensify the characteristics of the plant – both the good and the bad. The offspring of such a cross usually produces some of the best (and some of the worst) offspring possible. Because of the possible gene intensification, the resulting plants are may often be homozygous for most of their traits (and therefore be somewhat dominant in breeding).

In addition to Phal. Flight of Birds, some of the more important offspring (in breeding) of Phal. Misty Green are Phal. Chiayi Spot (never really available in North America), Phal. Goldberry, Phal. Golden Peoker, Phal. Misty Moon and Phal. Green Mist. Their offspring have all been registered in the 1990s and it is really premature to comment on them. However, because of the mutation with Phal. Golden Peoker ‘Brother’ producing the ‘ES’, JC/AOS clone and others, expect a LOT of breeding with it – both the mutated and regular forms.  (Since writing this article, there have been 2 (!!!) FCCs given to offspring of the mutated P. Golden Peokers.)

Let's look at this plant again in 10 years.  There may be some surprises.

Awards

bullet

‘Lime Chiffon’, AM – 80 - April 18, 1980 – George Schwartz – 7.6 cm.
8 flowers & 10 buds on 2 inflorescences; deep lemon-lime sepals and petals.

bullet

‘Carnival’, HCC – 75 – April 18, 1980 – George Schwartz
4 star-shaped, closed flowers & 5 buds on 1 inflorescence; sepals waxy cream white, apices light yellow; sepals & petals barred & spotted concentrically with rose purple, concentrated centrally.

bullet

‘Carriage Hill’, HCC – 77 – April 14, 1980 – Carriage Hill Farm
5 flowers & 2 buds on 1 inflorescence; light greenish-yellow with concentric oblong dots becoming less numerous apically.

bullet

‘Lime Lite’, HCC – 77 – 8.1 cm., April 14, 1980 – George Schwartz
5 flowers & 5 buds on 1 nicely arched inflorescence; yellowish-chartreuse flowers with prominent maroon radial barring centrally, fading apically.

bullet

‘Piccadilly’, HCC – 78, 8.0 cm., May 12, 1980 – George Schwartz
4 flowers & 3 buds on 1 inflorescence; ivory-green with horizontal bars of rose fuchsia in circular patterns, rose spotted apically.

bullet

‘Lime Fizz’, HCC – 78, 7.5 cm., May 12, 1980 – George Schwartz
7 flowers on 1 inflorescence; pippin-green with fuchsia spotting and bars.

bullet

‘Pistachio Queen’, HCC – 77, 7.0 cm., May 12, 1980 – George Schwartz
5 flowers on 1 inflorescence; lime-green with light maroon barring & spotting, petals slightly lighter than sepals.

bullet

‘Southwood’, HCC – 76, 8.4 cm., February 20, 1981 – Chuck Hoover
6 flowers on 1 inflorescence; ivory white spotted & blotched with rose magenta resembling Phal. Samba.

bullet

‘Charalyn’, HCC – 78, 8.5 cm., March 22, 1981 – Curtis A Tanaka
7 flowers on 1 inflorescence; soft yellow-green with soft lavender spots radiating from center.

bullet

‘Lime Mist’, AM – 80, 8.1 cm., April 27, 1981 – George Schwartz
6 flowers of good form and heavy substance and 1 bud on 1 inflorescence; lemon yellow with red-brown spotting and concentric rings centrally.

bullet

‘Lime Purity’, AM – 82, 8.0 cm., May 11, 1981 – George Schwartz
8 unusually round, flat flowers; lemon-green marked with rosy-red lavender

bullet

‘Lime Fair’, HCC – 76, 8.0 cm., May 11, 1981 – George Schwartz
5 flowers & 1 bud; greenish-yellow with concentric reddish-lavender spotting & barring

bullet

‘Lime Festival’, HCC – 79, 7.2 cm., May 18, 1981 – George Schwartz
6 flowers on 1 inflorescence; yellow-green with concentric violet spotting on bases.

bullet

‘Zuma Valley’, HCC – 78, 7.5 cm., March 26, 1982 – Zuma Canyon Orchids
10 flowers & 3 buds on 2 inflorescences;pale yellow with concentric rose bars at bases, spots at outer portions.

bullet

‘Martis’, HCC – 79, 7.3 cm., March 28, 1982 – Curtis A. Tanaka
7 flowers & 2 buds on 1 inflorescence; chartreuse with pinkish and mauve dots in a concentric pattern.  (This plant received an award one year later from the HOS and was generally significantly larger.)

bullet

‘Brazos’, HCC – 75, 8.0 cm., April 30, 1983 – Mrs. Kathie Jordan
11 flowers on 1 inflorescence; light yellow with rose-lavender spots.

bullet

‘Arlington’, AM – 85, 9.2 cm., February 22, 1984 – Arnold Klehm
7 flowers & 5 buds on 1 cut branched inflorescence; chartreuse with lavender bars, more concentric towards center of flower.

bullet

‘Manoa’, HCC – 78, 8.5 cm., February 24, 1985 – James F. Lenney
5 flowers & 2 buds on 1 inflorescence; bright mimosa yellow blending to creamy yellow as flowers get older with concentric rose bars near center.

bullet

‘Melissa’, AM – 80, 8.4 cm., February 5, 1986 – Guayacan Orchids
5 flowers & 1 bud on 1 inflorescence; light lemon yellow, lightening towards center, attractively spotted overall with reddish purple.

bullet

‘Lillian’, AM – 81, 9.0 cm., January 29, 1987 – Coqui Nurseries Inc.
4 flowers & 1 bud on 1 inflorescence; greenish yellow with reddish spots centrally.

bullet

‘Moncho’, AM – 80, 9.2 cm., January 29, 1987 – Coqui Nurseries Inc.
4 flowers & 1 bud on 1 inflorescence; greenish yellow with reddish spots centrally.

bullet

‘Ponce’, HCC – 78, 8.70 cm., Jan. 28, 1988 – Coqui Nurseries Inc.
4 flowers on 1 inflorescence, greenish yellow with reddish spots & bars concentrated towards center.

bullet

‘Nilsa’, AM – 81, 9.6 cm., March 15, 1989 – Mr. & Mrs. Raul Tous Calle
13 full flowers & 5 buds on 2 inflorescences; lemon yellow apically, creamish yellow with reddish spots & bars centrally.

bullet

‘Hampshire’, AM – 81, 9.10 cm., May 25, 1991 – Arnold Klehm
21 full, flat flowers & 1 bud on 1 branched inflorescence; crystalline white with dark rose markings.

bullet

‘Kathryn Foss’, HCC – 77, 8.8 cm., April 10, 1993 – Walter & Kathryn Foss
15 flowers on 2 inflorescences; yellow-green with magenta concentric bars & spots.

bullet

‘La Pastora’, AM – 80, 8.0 cm., October 30, 1993 – A. R. Gibson
16 flowers & 1 bud on 1 branched inflorescence; chartreuse with concentric burgundy bars & spots.

bullet

‘Selsal’, AM – 80, 8.9 cm., February 3, 1994 – Jose & Irma Selles
6 flowers & 2 buds on 1 cut inflorescence; white with chartreuse on outer halves, maroon bars on inner halves.

N.B. These descriptions are very brief and can be somewhat misleading. For example, the ‘Kathryn Foss’ clone appears to be similar to the ‘Moncho’ clone, only 3 points less and .4 cm smaller in natural spread. But, if you take the time to consult the Awards Quarterly, you will see that the petals are about ½" narrower.

The opinions expressed in the plant of the month articles are those of Howard S. Ginsberg and are based on various discussions, observations and research which includes American Orchid Society Awards by James R. Fisher and David A. Bishop (available from the American Orchid Society) as well as the Wildcatt Database (available from the Wildcatt Database Company). The Wildcatt Database may not be perfect but it is far and away better than whatever is in second place.


Home Bamboo Baby Deventeriana