|
| |
|
|
|
Phal.
Misty Green
Phal.
Misty Green undoubtedly merits an important place in the Phalaenopsis
hall of fame. The hybrid was registered in 1981 by George Schwartz for
Joseph Redlinger as a hybrid between Phal. Barbara Moler and Phal.
Bamboo Baby. Presumably, Mr. Schwartz wanted to register the hybrid for
one reason – or at least 10 reasons: the 10 awards that he had
received for various clones of Misty Green at the time that he
registered the hybrid.
Writing
about Phalaenopsis Misty Green at this point is a little like Macaulay
Culkin writing an autobiography. Sure, he’s made some movies but there’s
so much ahead of him. The first Phal. Misty Green hybrid was registered
in 1983. Eighteen years later, it’s just too early to say anything. I
have plants of Phal. Misty Green ‘Nilsa’, AM/AOS as well as ‘Moncho’,
AM/AOS (the latter being one of the most vigorous plants I have ever
grown) and I can’t wait for the crosses I've made to bloom.
Considering Phal. Misty Green’s record to date, some of these hybrids
should be magnificent. (N.B. For those new to phals, you have to realize
that yellow phal. breeding only began in earnest about 30 years ago.)
From
1980 until 1994, Phal. Misty Green continued to rack up AOS awards –
27 of them in all. In much the same as its award history, Phal. Misty
Green is the parent of several hybrids registered every year, not many
but enough to come to a total of about 90 to date. This is interesting.
Because both parents were awarded and accessible, Phal. Misty Green was
made and remade. In addition, at least one selfing of an awarded clone
was made. Stem propagations were made and remade. The price for many was
reasonable. Seedlings were readily available. And, exceptionally
important, they were very fertile. Because so many seedlings were
available, almost anybody doing some hybridizing in the '80s had a plant
of Phal. Misty Green.
In
the first generation, Phal. Misty Green may not be unique but it is
surely one of the top phal. producers of all time. A list of its
first-generation hybrids reveals almost 20 hybrids with awards (Dtps.
Memoria Rene Chauvin, Phal. August Gold, Phal. Brother Dawn, Phal.
Brother Princess, Phal. Buena Cerise Sparks, Phal. Chula, Phal. Corona
de Oro, Phal. Everglades Sunset, Phal. Gemstone’s Hawaiian Mist, Phal.
Goldberry, Phal. Golden Circles, Phal. Golden Peoker, Phal. Grapefruit,
Phal. Misty Moon, Phal. Pine Hill, Phal. Selsal’s Arrakis, Phal.
Yellow Lightning), or about 20%. This may not seem like much but it is
probably one of the highest percentages in the history of phal.
breeding. Is it really better than its parents or has it just been bred
better?
As
far as great stud plants, you have to remember what happened with Beta
and VHS. Although I have never seen a Beta machine, I am told by many
people who should know that Beta was much better that VHS but today Beta
is a thing of the past and everybody has VHS. Advertising and hype do a
lot to shape and form our opinions. Every breeder ran out and purchased
Phal. Deventeriana (and then bred with it). Even people new to breeding
know that Phal. Deventeriana is a "must have". But how many
people have a good Phal. Misty Green and how many people who are new to
breeding run out and get one. Many of the "old-timers" are
remaking old crosses using superior parents, both species and hybrids,
such as Phal. Misty Green, and the results are outstanding.
One
of the more interesting (and widely available) hybrids of Phal. Misty
Green is Phal. Flight of Birds. Anyone who takes the time will quickly
realize that Phal. Misty Green is both a parent and grandparent of Phal.
Flight of Birds. (It is a hybrid of Phal. Pine Hill and Phal Misty
Green. Phal. Pine Hill is Phal. Lorraine Kenney x Phal. Misty Green.)
Yet, only one of the awarded clones seems to have any yellow at all.
(Breeding a plant back to its parent is inbreeding or linebreeding. You
intensify the characteristics of the plant – both the good and the
bad. The offspring of such a cross usually produces some of the best
(and some of the worst) offspring possible. Because of the possible gene
intensification, the resulting plants are may often be homozygous for
most of their traits (and therefore be somewhat dominant in breeding).
In
addition to Phal. Flight of Birds, some of the more important offspring
(in breeding) of Phal. Misty Green are Phal. Chiayi Spot (never really
available in North America), Phal.
Goldberry, Phal. Golden Peoker, Phal. Misty Moon and Phal. Green Mist.
Their offspring have all been registered in the 1990s and it is really
premature to comment on them. However, because of the mutation with
Phal. Golden Peoker ‘Brother’ producing the ‘ES’, JC/AOS clone
and others, expect a LOT of breeding with it – both the mutated and
regular forms. (Since writing this article, there have been 2
(!!!) FCCs given to offspring of the mutated P. Golden Peokers.)
Let's
look at this plant again in 10 years. There may be some surprises.
Awards
 |
‘Lime
Chiffon’,
AM – 80 - April 18, 1980 – George Schwartz – 7.6 cm.
8 flowers & 10 buds on 2 inflorescences; deep lemon-lime sepals
and petals. |
 |
‘Carnival’,
HCC – 75 – April 18, 1980 – George Schwartz
4
star-shaped, closed flowers & 5 buds on 1 inflorescence; sepals waxy
cream white, apices light yellow; sepals & petals barred &
spotted concentrically with rose purple, concentrated centrally. |
 |
‘Carriage
Hill’,
HCC – 77 – April 14, 1980 – Carriage Hill Farm
5
flowers & 2 buds on 1 inflorescence; light greenish-yellow with
concentric oblong dots becoming less numerous apically. |
 |
‘Lime
Lite’,
HCC – 77 – 8.1 cm., April 14, 1980 – George Schwartz
5
flowers & 5 buds on 1 nicely arched inflorescence;
yellowish-chartreuse flowers with prominent maroon radial barring
centrally, fading apically. |
 |
‘Piccadilly’,
HCC – 78, 8.0 cm., May 12, 1980 – George Schwartz
4
flowers & 3 buds on 1 inflorescence; ivory-green with horizontal
bars of rose fuchsia in circular patterns, rose spotted apically. |
 |
‘Lime
Fizz’,
HCC – 78, 7.5 cm., May 12, 1980 – George Schwartz
7
flowers on 1 inflorescence; pippin-green with fuchsia spotting and bars. |
 |
‘Pistachio
Queen’,
HCC – 77, 7.0 cm., May 12, 1980 – George Schwartz
5
flowers on 1 inflorescence; lime-green with light maroon barring &
spotting, petals slightly lighter than sepals. |
 |
‘Southwood’,
HCC – 76, 8.4 cm., February 20, 1981 – Chuck Hoover
6
flowers on 1 inflorescence; ivory white spotted & blotched with rose
magenta resembling Phal. Samba. |
 |
‘Charalyn’,
HCC – 78, 8.5 cm., March 22, 1981 – Curtis A Tanaka
7
flowers on 1 inflorescence; soft yellow-green with soft lavender spots
radiating from center. |
 |
‘Lime
Mist’,
AM – 80, 8.1 cm., April 27, 1981 – George Schwartz
6
flowers of good form and heavy substance and 1 bud on 1 inflorescence;
lemon yellow with red-brown spotting and concentric rings centrally. |
 |
‘Lime
Purity’,
AM – 82, 8.0 cm., May 11, 1981 – George Schwartz
8
unusually round, flat flowers; lemon-green marked with rosy-red lavender |
 |
‘Lime
Fair’,
HCC – 76, 8.0 cm., May 11, 1981 – George Schwartz
5
flowers & 1 bud; greenish-yellow with concentric reddish-lavender
spotting & barring |
 |
‘Lime
Festival’,
HCC – 79, 7.2 cm., May 18, 1981 – George Schwartz
6
flowers on 1 inflorescence; yellow-green with concentric violet spotting
on bases. |
 |
‘Zuma
Valley’,
HCC – 78, 7.5 cm., March 26, 1982 – Zuma Canyon Orchids
10
flowers & 3 buds on 2 inflorescences;pale yellow with concentric
rose bars at bases, spots at outer portions. |
 |
‘Martis’,
HCC – 79, 7.3 cm., March 28, 1982 – Curtis A. Tanaka
7
flowers & 2 buds on 1 inflorescence; chartreuse with pinkish and
mauve dots in a concentric pattern. (This
plant received an award one year later from the HOS and was generally
significantly larger.) |
 |
‘Brazos’,
HCC – 75, 8.0 cm., April 30, 1983 – Mrs. Kathie Jordan
11 flowers on 1
inflorescence; light yellow with rose-lavender spots. |
 |
‘Arlington’,
AM – 85, 9.2 cm., February 22, 1984 – Arnold Klehm
7
flowers & 5 buds on 1 cut branched inflorescence; chartreuse with
lavender bars, more concentric towards center of flower. |
 |
‘Manoa’,
HCC – 78, 8.5 cm., February 24, 1985 – James F. Lenney
5
flowers & 2 buds on 1 inflorescence; bright mimosa yellow blending
to creamy yellow as flowers get older with concentric rose bars near
center. |
 |
‘Melissa’,
AM – 80, 8.4 cm., February 5, 1986 – Guayacan Orchids
5
flowers & 1 bud on 1 inflorescence; light lemon yellow, lightening
towards center, attractively spotted overall with reddish purple. |
 |
‘Lillian’,
AM – 81, 9.0 cm., January 29, 1987 – Coqui Nurseries Inc.
4
flowers & 1 bud on 1 inflorescence; greenish yellow with reddish
spots centrally. |
 |
‘Moncho’,
AM – 80, 9.2 cm., January 29, 1987 – Coqui Nurseries Inc.
4
flowers & 1 bud on 1 inflorescence; greenish yellow with reddish
spots centrally. |
 |
‘Ponce’,
HCC – 78, 8.70 cm., Jan. 28, 1988 – Coqui Nurseries Inc.
4
flowers on 1 inflorescence, greenish yellow with reddish spots &
bars concentrated towards center. |
 |
‘Nilsa’,
AM – 81, 9.6 cm., March 15, 1989 – Mr. & Mrs. Raul Tous Calle
13
full flowers & 5 buds on 2 inflorescences; lemon yellow apically,
creamish yellow with reddish spots & bars centrally. |
 |
‘Hampshire’,
AM – 81, 9.10 cm., May 25, 1991 – Arnold Klehm
21
full, flat flowers & 1 bud on 1 branched inflorescence; crystalline
white with dark rose markings. |
 |
‘Kathryn
Foss’,
HCC – 77, 8.8 cm., April 10, 1993 – Walter & Kathryn Foss
15
flowers on 2 inflorescences; yellow-green with magenta concentric bars
& spots. |
 |
‘La
Pastora’,
AM – 80, 8.0 cm., October 30, 1993 – A. R. Gibson
16
flowers & 1 bud on 1 branched inflorescence; chartreuse with
concentric burgundy bars & spots. |
 |
‘Selsal’,
AM – 80, 8.9 cm., February 3, 1994 – Jose & Irma Selles
6
flowers & 2 buds on 1 cut inflorescence; white with chartreuse on
outer halves, maroon bars on inner halves. |
N.B.
These descriptions are very brief and can be somewhat misleading. For
example, the ‘Kathryn Foss’ clone appears to be similar to the ‘Moncho’
clone, only 3 points less and .4 cm smaller in natural spread. But, if
you take the time to consult the Awards Quarterly, you will see that the
petals are about ½" narrower.
The opinions expressed in the plant of the month
articles are those of Howard S. Ginsberg and are based on various
discussions, observations and research which includes American Orchid
Society Awards by James R. Fisher and David A. Bishop (available from
the American
Orchid Society) as well as the Wildcatt Database (available from
the Wildcatt
Database Company). The Wildcatt Database may not be perfect but it
is far and away better than whatever is in second place.
|
|
|
|